http://bit.ly/gaychallenge A Practical Common Sense Challenge to Lesbians and Gays.

Cats having sex

Male and female cats teaching man about sex in the proper male-to-female order. See how this affect gays and lesbians.

One of the most ridiculous excuses that homosexuals use is to compare their lifestyle to what they consider to be observed homosexuality in the animal kingdom.

Their lie has grown to declare that over 10,000 animal species are “homosexual”.

Here’s one TRUTH that crushes their lie.
Let’s use their same comparison to animal behaviors to justify other BAD human behaviors.

Animals are known to:
-Eat their own young.
-Be cannibals.
-Rape
-Eat their own feces (ok, this one might actually line up with perverted human sex acts)

Therefore, using the same arguments, then we should not discriminate humans who developed those immoral/socially unacceptable behaviors!

I was gay for 20 years until I invited Jesus Christ into my life and completely surrendered to Him. I didn’t stop being gay and then accept Jesus as my Lord and Savior, I CAME JUST LIKE I was and received Jesus and He changed the desires of my heart.

This video clip from a 2004 interview with Dr. Robert Spitzer discusses his study of people who reported changes in aspects of homosexual orientation. In this clip, he discusses the purpose of the study, why he believed his participants, and what he learned from the study.

2. We came to believe the love of God, who forgave us and accepted us in spite of all that we are and have done.

3. We learned to see purpose in our suffering, that our failed lives were under God’s control, who is able to bring good out of trouble.

4. We came to believe that God had already broken the power of homosexuality and that He could therefore restore our true personhood.

5. We came to perceive that we had accepted a lie about ourselves, an illusion that had trapped us in a false identity.

6. We learned to claim our true reality that as humankind, we are part of God’s heterosexual creation and that God calls us to rediscover that identity in Him through Jesus Christ, as our faith perceives Him.

7. We resolved to entrust our lives to our loving God and to live by faith, praising Him for our new unseen identity, confident that it would become visible to us in God’s good time.

8. As forgiven people free from condemnation, we made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves, determined to root out fear, hidden hostility, and contempt for the world.

9. We admitted to God, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs and humbly asked God to remove our defects of character.

10. We willingly made direct amends wherever wise and possible to all people we had harmed.

11. We determined to live no longer in fear of the world, believing that God’s victorious control turns all that is against us into our favor, bringing advantage out of sorrow and order from disaster.

12. We determined to mature in our relationships with men and women, learning the meaning of a partnership of equals, seeking neither dominance over people nor servile dependency on them.

13. We sought through confident praying, and the wisdom of Scripture for an ongoing growth in our relationship with God and a humble acceptance of His guidance for our lives.

14. Having had a spiritual awakening, we tried to carry this message to homosexual people with a love that demands nothing and to practice these steps in all our lives’ activities, as far as lies within us.

While the Homosexuals Anonymous Fellowship was inspired by the Twelve Steps of Alcoholics Anonymous, they are not really an adaptation. Rather, they were created specifically for this Fellowship, and should not be construed otherwise. AA, which is a program concerned only with recovery from alcoholism, and is not in any way affiliated with this Fellowship.

Source: Homosexuals Anonymous

The following repercussions, because they involve economic matters and social arrangements, are not significant factors in determining the moral status of homosexual activity. They just illustrate how troublingly complicated the systematic integration of homosexuality into a society would be if such integration is done fairly—-fairly in relation to heterosexuals as well as homosexuals (and bisexuals).
For example, if it makes sense to have separate barracks for male and female soldiers because of sexual attraction, then it also makes sense to have separate barracks for homosexual soldiers and separate barracks for straight soldiers, so straight soldiers are not ogled or sexually harassed by homosexual soldiers.

Now, while having separate barracks for homosexuals and heterosexuals would help solve the problem of homosexuals ogling or sexually harassing heterosexuals, it would probably exacerbate the problem of homosexuals ogling or sexually harassing each other since they are sexually attracted to each other and they would be confined in close quarters. Oddly enough, in order to ameliorate that problem it would make some sense to mix male homosexuals with lesbians in the same barracks because they do not sexually attract each other. This mixing would reduce the amount of sexual desire or tension in homosexual barracks. (We would have a problem housing bisexual soldiers since they can ogle homosexual men and lesbians and heterosexual men and heterosexual women and other bisexuals.)

The logic we have applied to barracks would similarly apply to all public bathroom facilities and to public showering facilities, like those in high school gymnasiums. If we condone homosexual behavior, then we would logically have to build separate public bathrooms and showers for homosexuals and heterosexuals, and the bathrooms for homosexuals should probably be shared by lesbians and male homosexuals. (We would have a problem regarding public bathrooms for bisexuals since they can ogle everybody, including other bisexuals.)

Regarding groups like the Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts, because they do not normally have grown men sleeping in the same tents with girls as they do with boys, adult homosexual scoutmasters should not be allowed to sleep in the same tents with Boy Scouts (but, oddly, it may be okay to let homosexual men sleep in the same tents with Girl Scouts since the former are not sexually attracted to the latter). Similarly, adult lesbian den mothers should not be allowed to sleep in the same tents with Girl Scouts (but they might be allowed to sleep in the same tents with Boy Scouts). Bisexual scoutmasters should not be allowed to sleep in tents with Girl or Boy Scouts.

Are we beginning to appreciate the difficulties involved in a society condoning and fully integrating homosexuality and bisexuality into its various communities?

Credit: Committee on Family and Social Health